libwebsockets features * Provides server and client APIs for RFC6455 v13 ws:// and wss:// websocket protocol, along with http:// and https:// * Can be configured to use OpenSSL, CyaSSL, or WolfSSL to provide fully encrypted client and server links - including client certificate support * Lightweight and fast even at 250K connections per thread and beyond - performance per byte and performance per MIPS many times better than traditional solutions * CMake based project that has been used in a variety of OS contexts including Linux (uclibc and glibc), ARM-based embedded boards, MBED3, MIPS / OpenWRT, Windows, Android, Apple iOS and even Tivo. It's used all over the place including The New York Times customer-facing servers and BMW. * It includes a stub webserver that is enough to deliver your scripts to the browser that open websocket connections back to the same server, so it can solve the entire server side, ws://, wss://, http://, and https:// in one step. Apache, Java or any other server-side support is not needed. * Compliant browsers from the last few years are supported on any platform. * Full-strength SSL suport: A+ on SSLLABS test (this server is powered by lwsws) * Architectural features like nonblockinng event loop, zero-copy for payload data and FSM-based protocol parsers make it ideal for realtime operation on resource-constrained devices * Simple, pure C: user code creates a libwebsockets context with options and a callback, library calls the callback when events occur on the connection - no activity on connections == 0% CPU * Posix poll(), libev (ie, epoll) and libuv event loops supported * Proxy support, including Basic Auth

Code Quality Rank: L2
Programming language: C
License: GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
Tags: Networking     HTTP     WebSocket    
Latest version: v4.3.0

libwebsockets alternatives and similar libraries

Based on the "Networking" category.
Alternatively, view libwebsockets alternatives based on common mentions on social networks and blogs.

Do you think we are missing an alternative of libwebsockets or a related project?

Add another 'Networking' Library


CI status Coverity Scan Build Status CII Best Practices Codacy Badge Total alerts Language grade: C/C++ Language grade: JavaScript


Libwebsockets is a simple-to-use, MIT-license, pure C library providing client and server for http/1, http/2, websockets, MQTT and other protocols in a security-minded, lightweight, configurable, scalable and flexible way. It's easy to build and cross-build via cmake and is suitable for tasks from embedded RTOS through mass cloud serving.

It supports a lot of lightweight ancilliary implementations for things like JSON, CBOR, JOSE, COSE, and supports OpenSSL and MbedTLS v2 and v3 out of the box for everything. It's very gregarious when it comes to event loop sharing, supporting libuv, libevent, libev, sdevent, glib and uloop, as well as custom event libs.

100+ independent minimal examples for various scenarios, CC0-licensed (public domain) for cut-and-paste, allow you to get started quickly.

There are a lot of READMEs on a variety of topics.

We do a huge amount of CI testing per push, currently 582 builds on 30 platforms. You can see the lws CI rack and read about how lws-based Sai is used to coordinate all the testing.



Perl binding for lws available

Thanks to Felipe Gasper, there's now a perl binding for lws available at metacpan, this uses the recent generic event loop support in lws to have lws as a guest on an existing perl event loop.

Lws examples switching to Secure Streams

[Secure Streams direct](./doc-assets/ss-api1.png)

Secure Streams support in lws was introduced a couple of years ago, it's a higher-level interface to lws wsi-level apis that simplifies connectivity by segregating connection policy like protocol and endpoint information into a separate [JSON policy file](./minimal-examples/client/hello_world/example-policy.json), and just having the [code deal with payloads](./minimal-examples/clients/hello_world/hello_world-ss.c); as many details of the wire protocol as possible are hidden or moved to the policy, so user code is almost identical even if the wire protocol changes.

The user code just asks to create a SS by "streamtype name", it is created according to the details (protocol, endpoint, etc) under the same name in the policy.

Key policy entries like endpoint can contain ${metadata-name} string substitutions to handle runtime adaptations via metadata. h1, h2, ws and mqtt are supported.

As a layer on top of the wsi apis, SS provides a higher-level way to access the existing wsi-level capabilities, both kinds of API will remain supported. Secure Streams are longer-lived than a single wsi, so an SS can coordinate retries by itself. SS-based user code is typically significantly smaller and more maintainable than wsi layer.

In main branch I have moved the older examples into ./minimal-examples-lowlevel and am starting to port more cases from there into SS-based examples.

Comparison between wsi and SS level lws usage

Feature "low-level" wsi way Secure Streams way
Create context code same
Loop support, sul scheduler default, event libs same
Supports comms mode Client, Server, Raw same
Supports protocols h1, h2, ws, mqtt (client) same
TLS support mbedtls (including v3), openssl (including v3), wolfssl, boringssl, libressl same
Serializable, proxiable, muxable, transportable No Yes
Auto-allocated per-connection user object pss specified in lws_protocols Specified in ss info struct
Connection User API Protocol-specific lws_protocols cbs (> 100) SS API (rx, tx, state callbacks only)
Sending adaptation lws_callback_on_writeable() + WRITEABLE lws_ss_request_write() + tx() cb
Sending buffer User-chosen + malloc'd partial handling SS-provided, no partials
Create vhosts code JSON policy
TLS validation cert bundle or code JSON policy, or cert bundle
Connection retry / backoff code JSON policy, Auto
Nailing up code JSON policy, Auto
Endpoint and protocol details spread around the code JSON policy
Protocol selection, pipeline / stream sharing code JSON policy
ws subprotocol selection code JSON policy
ws binary / text code JSON policy
Protocol-specific metadata Protocol-specific apis in code (eg, lws_hdr) JSON policy, generic metadata apis in code
Connection validity rules struct JSON policy, Auto
Stream as Long Poll code JSON policy
Auth code JSON policy + automatic rotation if provider supported, else code

Serialized Secure Streams

[Secure Streams direct](./doc-assets/ss-api2.png)

Secure Streams APIs are also serializable, the exact same client code can fulfil the connection directly in the same process as you would expect, or forward the actions, metadata and payloads to an [SS Proxy](./minimal-examples/ssproxy/ssproxy-socket) that owns the policy over a Unix Domain or TCP socket connection to be fulfilled centrally. This allows, eg, h2 streams from different processes sharing a single connection.

[Secure Streams direct](./doc-assets/ss-api3.png)

The serialized SS can also travel over generic transports like UART, an [example is provided implementing the Binance example on an RPi Pico](./minimal-examples/embedded/pico/pico-sspc-binance) with a UART transport to a [UART transport SS proxy](./minimal-examples/ssproxy/ssproxy-custom-transport-uart), where the pico itself has no network stack, tls, compression or wss stack, but can send and receive to and from the endpoint as if it did.

The optional lws_trasport_mux is used to interpose between the UART transport and the SSPC layer, allowing a single pipe to carry many separate SS connections.

The user SS code is identical however it is transported, muxed and fulfilled.

v4.3 is released

See the changelog

Lws work retrospective

The initial commit for lws will have been 11 years ago come Oct 28 2021, it's been a lot of work. There are a total of 4.3K patches, touching 800KLOC cumulatively (this is not the size in the repo, but over the years, how many source lines were changed by patches).


Gratifyingly, it turns out over the years, ~15% of that was contributed by 404 contributors: that's not so bad. Thanks a lot to everyone who has provided patches.

Today at least tens of millions of devices and product features rely on lws to handle their communications including several from FAANG; Google now include lws as part of Android sources.


This is the libwebsockets C library for lightweight websocket clients and servers. For support, visit


and consider joining the project mailing list at


You can get the latest version of the library from git:

Doxygen API docs for development: https://libwebsockets.org/lws-api-doc-main/html/index.html

*Note that all licence references and agreements mentioned in the libwebsockets README section above are relevant to that project's source code only.